Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Garrison v. NDOC Director, et al
as 3:2017cv00391
Defendant:
E. Albana, B. Aulkner, R. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Munford, Town of et al
as 1:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
Judith Moon
Defendant:
Munford, Town of , David Dabbs , Lee Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Garrison v. Deputy Director NDOC et al
as 2:2016cv01050
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Director NDOC
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Garrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garrison v. Baker
as 3:2015cv00429
Defendant:
Warden Renee Baker
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Garrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrison v. United State District Court et al
as 2:2015cv00385
Defendant:
Federal Court of Nevada and United State District Court
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Garrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthew Barker v. W. McKeithen, et al
as 15-10760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
W. FRANK MCKEITHEN and ROBERT LEE GARRISON, Individually
Rossi v. Garrison et al
as 1:2014cv01642
Defendant:
Nancie Jo Bowers, Dennis Burge, Stephen D. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
James Harold Rossi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARKER v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 5:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BARKER
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE , W FRANK MCKEITHEN and ROBERT LEE GARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
