Cases 11 - 20 of 42
LEMON v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00562
Plaintiff:
TERRI ANNE LEMON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FONTAN et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LESLIE MICHAEL FONTAN , ELAINE ANN FONTAN LEMONS and GLEN PAUL FONTAN
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMPANY , JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY et al v. ARAMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02678
Plaintiff:
CHAL D. KENNEDY, SR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC , WALTER FLAHERTY , VERONICA LEMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemon v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012cv02593
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemon
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
LEMON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv01004
Plaintiff:
TERRI ANNE LEMON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEMON v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81730
Plaintiff:
H.D. LEMON
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SACCO v. LEMONS et al
as 2:2010cv01253
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COLIN SACCO
Defendant:
ROBERT M. LEMONS, JR., CARL MARTIN and PAUL M. MARTOS, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABED, ET AL. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02939
Plaintiff:
SARA ABED , MARILYN ACCUNZO , ROBERT ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEMONS v. THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60590
Plaintiff:
EVELYN LEMONS
Defendant:
THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEMONS v. W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
as 2:2010cv60694
Plaintiff:
EVELYN LEMONS
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
