Cases 11 - 20 of 1,637
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LEWIS v. SUTHERLAND et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER LEWIS
Defendant:
MARK SUTHERLAND, ANDREW LESLIE, ZANTAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BENNETT v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
JO BENNETT
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP, BARRY S ALEXANDER, SAMANTHA J BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lewis v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Brooke Lewis
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, Novo Nordisk U S Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
G.A. v. SNEAD et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
G.A.
Defendant:
MEG SNEAD, DR. VAL ARKOOSH, RACHEL LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Defendant:
Lee Ann Taurasi, Robert Martin, Eric Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EARLS v. COLLINS et al
as 3:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAYMOND EARLS, III
Defendant:
JOHN COLLINS, BARR, TIPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
