Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Pak v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Infirmary Doctor Dr. Jane/John Doe, Jacob Beasley, GCHC Nurses Doe 1 and 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Kymell Pak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Frost et al
as 2:2020cv00828
Defendant:
FNU Harry, FNU Frost and FNU Solis
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Lewis Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Brown
as 20-1959
Interested Party:
KRISTEN SENZ and WMUR-TV
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD LEWIS BROWN
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Baez v. High Risk Enforcement LLC et al
as 0:2020cv61967
Plaintiff:
Raymond Emmanuel Baez, Jr.
Defendant:
High Risk Enforcement LLC and Lewis Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
McCaskill et al v. American Public Defense Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05097
Defendant:
Ernest Jackson, Valencia Brown, Lewis Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Carlitos McTizic and Bryson McCaskill
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84565
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIK LEWIS BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv01381
Defendant:
Greg Jolley, H Oren, Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00732
Respondent:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Warden and Agents of the USA
Petitioner:
Edward Lewis Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv85837
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Brown v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 20-15402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD LEWIS BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as John and Jane Does 1-50, employees of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
