Cases 11 - 20 of 280
Houston (PS) v. Starr et al
as 1:2023cv03423
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
M. Starr, Vido, A. Armijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03308
Plaintiff:
Daniel Esteban Camas Lopez
Defendant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC and Marriott International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Konecny (PS) v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
State of Texas, Collin County Texas, Tarrant County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mohamed et al v. Denver County School District 1 et al
as 1:2023cv03112
Defendant:
Denver County School District 1, Denver Public Schools, Alex Marrero and others
Plaintiff:
Safia Mohamed, Mohamed Ibrahim and Suad Ahmed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02884
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramirez (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02708
Petitioner:
Jenifer A. Lopez Ramirez
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez v. Woodson et al
as 1:2023cv02689
Plaintiff:
Jason Lopez
Defendant:
Leonard Woodson, Kruger, Lindsay Gouty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
