Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Ricardo Ceja-Herrera v. William Barr
as 20-72439
Petitioner:
RICARDO CEJA-HERRERA, AKA Jose Luis Ceja, AKA Jose Luis Ceja Herrera
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Herrera-Rios v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv01521
Defendant:
of America United States and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzaga Herrera-Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
USA v. Luis Gonzalez-Herrera
as 19-50756
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS CARLOS GONZALEZ-HERRERA, also known as Luis Carlos Gonzales Herrera, also known as Luis Carlos Herrera-Gonzalez, also known as Carlos Luis Gonzalez-Herrera
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Herrera v. JLG Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02752
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, JLG Industries, Inc. and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Luis Leon Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herrera et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv03216
Defendant:
Aubrey Fox, City of New York, Cyrus Vance and others
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Herrera and Luis A. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Luis Herrera, Sr.
as 18-16452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS FERMIN HERRERA, Sr.
Membreno et al v. Kargmans, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00332
Plaintiff:
Miseal Arevalo Membreno , Henry Valladares , Darlin Anael Membreno and others
Defendant:
Kargmans, INC. and Arthur Kargman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Herrera v. USA
as 2:2017cv02960
Petitioner:
Luis Fermin Herrera, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Luis A. Herrera v. Secretary of Corrections
as 8:2017cv01925
Petitioner:
Luis A. Herrera
Respondent:
Secretary of Corrections
Rafael Sanchez Herrera v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72578
Petitioner:
RAFAEL SANCHEZ HERRERA, AKA Jose Luis Sanchez Herrera
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
