Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Amy Lynn Clark v. Laurance J. Severance et al
as 2:2022cv04076
Plaintiff:
Amy Lynn Clark
Defendant:
Laurance J. Severance, District Attorney, Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00762
Plaintiff:
Adams, Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Holbrook, et al
as 22-35455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent, JULIE MARTIN, KECIA L. RONGEN and others
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Adams, Levi Allen, Kimberly Alverson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Amy Lynn Clark v. Mindy Guilett et al
as 2:2022cv03283
Plaintiff:
Amy Lynn Clark
Defendant:
Mindy Guilett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00296
Petitioner:
Lynn Clark, II
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01063
Petitioner:
Traci Lynne Clark
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2021cv00418
Petitioner:
TRACI LYNNE CLARK
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
