Cases 11 - 20 of 33
BARLEY v. WESTIN OPERATOR LLC
as 2:2019cv02643
Defendant:
MARRIOTT HOTEL PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., MARRIOTT PLP CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY BARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Gakuba v. Charles O'Brien, et al
as 19-1640
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. LOGLI, DEBRA SCHAFER, BEAU B. BRINDLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Peter Gakuba v. Charles O'Brien, et al
as 19-1598
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. LOGLI, DEBRA SCHAFER, BEAU B. BRINDLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Peter Gakuba v. Charles O'Brien, et al
as 19-1536
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. LOGLI, DEBRA SCHAFER, BEAU B. BRINDLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-20472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Spear v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Nina Spear
Defendant:
Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. , Marriot International Administrative Services, Inc. , Host Hotels & Resort, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SPEAR v. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06447
Plaintiff:
NINA SPEAR
Defendant:
MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. , MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. , HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sacks et al v. Marriott Corporation
as 1:2015cv08447
Defendant:
Marriott Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sanford Sacks and Susan Sacks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bray v. Marriott International et al
as 8:2014cv03645
Plaintiff:
Angela J Bray
Defendant:
Marriott International and Host Marriott Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
