Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Timeshare Help Source, LLC v. Maverick Bankcard, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
Timeshare Help Source and Timeshare Help Source, LLC
Defendant:
Maverick Bankcard, Inc, Owner Alan Griefer, Bob Sarkisyan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Hogan v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Maurice Hogan
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Kia Motors America, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00296
Defendant:
Takata Corp., Kia Motors America, Inc., Hyundai Motor Company and others
Plaintiff:
Cherie Russell, Victor Brown, Adriane Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hogan v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00473
Petitioner:
Maurice Hogan
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Smith et al
as 6:2022cv03079
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Billy E Smith, Ian S Donohue, Tiffany Podst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wess v. Dunn
as 4:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
Korey Maurice Wess
Defendant:
Scot Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Brewer
as 4:2021cv00764
Petitioner:
Maurice D Weaver
Respondent:
Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bemiss et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv04173
Plaintiff:
Roy Bemiss, Quinton Goodall, Maurice Joseph and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2021cv04172
Plaintiff:
Roy Bemiss, Quinton Goodall, Maurice Joseph and others
Defendant:
Sharon Wallace, Joseph Sirianni, Daniel Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
