Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Tamburino #268269 v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01100
Defendant:
Susan Melton, James Hughs, Ingham County Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston #235170 v. Davids et al
as 1:2018cv00803
Defendant:
Plotnick, Ferguson, Gary Miniard and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston v. Davids et al
as 2:2018cv12181
Defendant:
Prince, Plotnick, Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston
Brooks v. McKenney et al
as 1:2018cv00572
Plaintiff:
Patricia Glynn Brooks
Defendant:
Malissa McKenney, Monica McKenney, Monica Hardlens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamburino #268269 v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv00942
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Defendant:
Vanessa Taylor, Heidi Washington, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Boles #156632 v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00721
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Kelly Murphy, Unknown McConkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Vance et al
as 2:2015cv10468
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Autumn N. Vance, Chrystal M. Heckerthorn, Elmer T. Vance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Farm Bureau General Insurance Company v. Melton
as 1:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Farm Bureau General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Steven Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tamburino #268269 v. Ingham County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 1:2012cv00970
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Defendant:
Stuart J. Dunnings, III, Ingham County Adult Probation, Mike Bryanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
