Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Gupta v. Northam et al
as 6:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Alisha Gupta
Defendant:
Dick Roberts, Daniel Carey, Ralph Northam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cortez-Melton, et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation, et al
as 3:2019cv00127
Plaintiff:
Dina Cortez-Melton
Defendant:
Capital One, National Association and Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riddick v. Barber et al
as 3:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Holly Ernouf, Dr. Galusha, Major Parham and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Matthew Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. United States Of America
as 2:2018cv00578
Plaintiff:
Gary Melton
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.29 ACRE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA, PARCEL ID NO. 0340000001800, IDENTIFIED AS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT FILED IN MAP BOOK 143, PAGE 97, et al. PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG only.
as 2:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.29 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCELIDENTIFICATION NO. 0340000001800, IDENTIFIED AS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT FILED IN MAP BOOK 143, PAGE 97, et al, William H. Melton, Jr., James Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Melton v. Wilson
as 1:2017cv00689
Petitioner:
Randy Alan Melton
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coleman v. McNelis et al
as 3:2016cv00961
Plaintiff:
Raymond Coleman
Defendant:
K. McNelis, Melton, Unnamed and Unknown Employee No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Antorn et al
as 1:2016cv01373
Plaintiff:
Denny C. Melton
Defendant:
V. Antorn, Austin, Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Clarke
as 1:2016cv01248
Petitioner:
Denny C. Melton
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Melton v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jackie L. Melton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
