Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Elannani v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00494
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Denis Riordan, Richard Gottlieb and others
Plaintiff:
Hassan Elannani and Hassan Elannani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Li v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
Tong Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Richard Gottlieb and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tao v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv00465
Plaintiff:
Jie Tao
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Richard Gottlieb and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Koa v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv00430
Plaintiff:
Lee Y. Koa
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
SONG v. CHERTOFF
as 1:2007cv00708
Plaintiff:
YAN SONG and QING ZHANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ATIF et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00690
Plaintiff:
SAID ATIF
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, RICHARD GOTTLIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
