Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Disability Services of Illinois v. Gray et al
as 1:2018cv07709
Plaintiff:
Disability Services of Illinois
Defendant:
Michael Patton, Felicia Gray and JAMES T. DIMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerardo Ortega, et al v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
as 18-80096
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
GERARDO ORTEGA and MICHAEL PATTON
Defendant - Respondent:
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., an Arkansas corporation, and DOES 1 TO 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Michael Patton v. Deborah Asuncion et al
as 2:2017cv00181
Respondent:
Deborah Asuncion and Kamala D. Harris
Petitioner:
Michael Patton
Michael Patton v. Debra Asuncion
as 2:2016cv08347
Respondent:
Debra Asuncion
Petitioner:
Michael Patton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McGee v. Macon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2016cv02221
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Department, Decatur Memorial Hospital, DMH Corporate Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Felita McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law Offices of Christopher J. Trainor & Associates, P.C. et al v. Patton et al
as 2:2014cv14246
Plaintiff:
Law Offices of Christopher J. Trainor & Associates, P.C. and Christopher Trainor
Defendant:
Michael Patton, ILEGAL MARKETING, ILEGALMARKETING.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Werner et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 2:2013cv10287
Plaintiff:
Jon Werner and Michael Patton
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Clifton Allen , Stephanie Allen , Krissa Anderson and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
