Cases 11 - 20 of 26
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEAPHART v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. LEAPHART
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY SMITH, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Martinez v. Simington et al
as 1:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez
Defendant:
Robert Simington, Lt. Kenneth Boal, Captain Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, CHAPLIN MILLER, Captain LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wayne Prater v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 19-1732
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH JURY, Nurse at SCI Houtzdale, RICHARD, MAINES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE PRATER
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OKEY v. SCI HOUTZDALE, et al.
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
PATRICK OKEY
Defendant:
SCI HOUTZDALE and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Okey v. SCI Houtzdale c/o Michelle Ivicic
as 1:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Patrick Okey
Defendant:
SCI Houtzdale c/o Michelle Ivicic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade Lee v. Kramer, et al
as 17-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE D. LEE
Defendant:
KRAMER, Supervisor of Correctional Industries, MICHELLE IVICIC, Prison Rape Compliance Manager, COX, Regional Director of Correctional Industries and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
