Cases 11 - 20 of 54
CLARK v. ELLSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN J CLARK
Defendant:
ELLSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD and ABIGAIL T MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIMOULAS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00536
Defendant:
JOHN SCHATTINGER, PRINCIPAL, DAVID WALKER, SUPERINTENDENT, MOUNT VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ATHANASIOS DIMOULAS, THELSIA DIMOULAS and ANTONIOS DIMOULAS
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC v. MAHON et al
as 1:2019cv00499
Interested Party:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC, PALISADES COLLECTION LLC and others
Defendant:
KIMBERLY J MAHON and CHARLES P MILLER
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERRILL v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2019cv00391
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, MAINE STATE POLICE COMPUTER CRIMES UNIT, GLENN LANG and others
Plaintiff:
MARC L MERRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. USA
as 2:2019cv00313
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DAVID MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCKENNEY v. JACQUES et al
as 2:2019cv00223
Defendant:
OFFICER REBECCA MILLER, MAJOR TIMOTHY KORTES and LT ARLENE JACQUES
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W MCKENNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00510
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MILLER and JANICE MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
