Cases 11 - 20 of 36
MUIR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04459
Defendant:
MR. J. HALL, JANE DOES, MR. S. SWARY and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL MUIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKER v. MCFADDEN et al
as 5:2019cv04840
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCFADDEN, MEGAN PANCOWISC, SGT. ZUBAR and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL S. MEEKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCFADDEN v. DALMASI et al
as 2:2017cv05787
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Defendant:
ODEIDA DALMASI, BAKER-BARTLETT, MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARGARITE et al
as 2:2017cv04818
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHRIS M. MARGARITE, CHRISTOPHER J. MARGARITE, CMC RESTORATIONS, INC. and others
Movant:
PAUL HANNAGAN , MARGARET HANNAGAN , CHRISTOPHER QUELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Johnson v. Wexford, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01800
Plaintiff:
Solomon Johnson
Defendant:
Wexford, Inc. and Muir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. AMG SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2017mc00079
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
AMG SERVICES, INC., RED CEDAR SREVICES, INC., SFS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
MUIR v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv02256
Petitioner:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KANDJABANGA v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
FESTUS KANDJABANGA
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, JOHN A. FRY, JAMES TSAFOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Robert Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
