Cases 11 - 20 of 654
MYERS v. HARRY
as 2:2023cv04594
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
LAUR HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. FOLEREZELL
as 2:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
DR. FOLEREZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ENGLISH, CAPTAIN MOONEY, SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gorrio v. Briggs et al
as 1:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorrio
Defendant:
Warden Greg Briggs, Correctional Officer Edwin Unknown, Correctional Officer Strawbridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Michael Myers
as 4:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREGORY v. NUNEZ et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
RODERICK GREGORY
Defendant:
Hearing Examiner FREDDY NUNEZ, C.O. MYERS, C.O. PATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MYERS v. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA., W LOUIS/SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
