Cases 11 - 20 of 369
WANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES WANG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02172
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES BARNES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAGEMANN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES HAGEMANN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Watts, et al
as 23-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
KATRINA WATTS, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE, JOE MCSHERRY and others
NINTEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22210
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES NINTEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kanita Wilburn, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-12630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KANITA M. WILBURN, COLTON BLAKE DAVIS, STEVEN LEE ECKMEYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
3M COMPANY
Matthew Snyder v. 3M Company
as 23-12640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES SNYDER
Defendant / Appellee:
3M COMPANY
United States v. Matthew McCauley
as 23-2764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew James McCauley
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03301
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Grimes v. Wats et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Grimes
Defendant:
Katrina Wats, Shell Point Mortgage, Joe McSherry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
