Cases 11 - 20 of 1,257
Patton v. Frank et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton #356869, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Shae, Unknown Vanwormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. UNUM Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Arthur
Defendant:
UNUM Insurance Company of America, Blue Cross Blue Sheild of Michigan d/b/a BCBSM and Garber Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Frank et al
as 4:2024cv11129
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank, Shae, Vanwormer and others
Schuler et al v. B&L Systems, LLC, et al
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Garrett Schuler, Robert Maurer, Matthew Groh and others
Defendant:
B&L Systems, LLC, d/b/a Fifth Wheel Freight, Reese Van Heck, Josh Browley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Matthews et al v. Crown Defense Ltd., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv11022
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthews and Brenda Matthews
Defendant:
Crown Defense Ltd., Inc., Jon Marshall and Juan Hueck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Michigan, State of v. Matthews
as 2:2024cv10805
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
Marlon Demon Matthews
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
