Cases 11 - 20 of 306
MILLER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00288
Defendant:
THOMPSON, JOHN DOE #5, MR. MICHEAL LEFEBVRE and others
Plaintiff:
MILLER, CHERYL ANN MILLER and ROBERT STEVEN BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCCARTY v. VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGED DISABILITY PLAN
as 2:2014cv01747
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE M. MCCARTY
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGED DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
James v. Varano et al
as 1:2014cv01951
Plaintiff:
Paris L. James
Defendant:
David Varano, Kathryn McCarty, Lori Alderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarty et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01772
Plaintiff:
Narges McCarty and Sargon McCarty
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTY v. ATLANTIC EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv05125
Plaintiff:
DONNELL MCCARTY
Defendant:
ATLANTIC EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION CORP. and APRIL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAnulty v. Mooney et al
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan McAnulty
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, David A. Varano, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN ERIN MCCARTY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAnulty v. Mooney et al
as 3:2013cv03104
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan McAnulty
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, David A. Varano, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY v. MCCARTY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv74043
Claimant:
FREEPORT-MCMORAN ENERGY LLC, REILLY-BENTON COMPANY, INC., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Petitioner:
MURPHY EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Varano et al
as 1:2013cv02518
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
David A. Varano, Vincent Mooney, Anthony Luscavage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
