Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Hellyer et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Theodis Washington
Defendant:
Hunter Hellyer, Josh Morgan, Megan Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYMAN v. MCHENRY, et al.
as 4:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
TAVON JAMAL HYMAN
Defendant:
SHANE J. MCHENRY, KELLY HOGG and MEGAN WATHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIPTON v. TUNNER
as 1:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
MEGAN TIPTON
Respondent:
LASHELL TUNNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KEMP v. SMPRETTY, INC.
as 4:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
MEGAN KEMP
Defendant:
SMPRETTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MOORE v. KERN et al
as 1:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MOORE
Defendant:
MARIE KERN, MEGAN L. GEHRING, KRISTY L. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEMP v. SMPRETTY, INC.
as 1:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
MEGAN KEMP
Defendant:
SMPRETTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JOHNSON v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, TRAVIS LEWIS, JARED HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARLEY v. OWEN COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
DWEN COUNTY INDIANA, DON VANDERMOERELL, BILL HOBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARPENTER et al v. CLINARD et al
as 1:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CARPENTER and MEGAN CARPENTER
Defendant:
ROY E. CLINARD, LONG'S TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIR and SMITH TRANSPORT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
