Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Curtis v. USA
as 1:2016cv03825
Petitioner:
Melvin Curtis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Melvin Ellis, Jr. v. State of Texas, et al
as 16-40688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN CURTIS ELLIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, State of Texas
Curtis v. Billingsey
as 1:2016cv02558
Petitioner:
Melvin Curtis
Respondent:
T. Billingsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Melvin Curtis Ellis, Jr
Defendant:
State of Texas and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis v. Billingsey
as 1:2012cv04906
Respondent:
T. Billingsey
Petitioner:
Melvin Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Spencer (Beverly)
as 12-3636
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deshawn Reese, AKA Day Day, Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti, Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx
United States of America v. Spencer (Reese)
as 12-3631
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti, Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J., Christopher Brown, AKA X and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Deshawn Reese, AKA Day Day and Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx
CURTIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv45753
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CURTIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
United States of America v. Spencer (Luciano)
as 11-1163
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cameron Spencer, Jr., AKA C.J., Dakota Beverly, AKA Chinx, Christopher Brown, AKA X and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Miguel Luciano, AKA Goti
CURTIS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74056
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CURTIS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
