Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Hernandez v. Davis
as 7:2022cv00539
Petitioner:
Enrique Albert Hernandez
Respondent:
Melvin Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Royal v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jarice L. Royal
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Scott
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Wallens Ridge et al
as 7:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge, Red Onion, River North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. VADOC Western Regional et al
as 7:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Evan Lee McNair
Defendant:
VADOC Western Regional, Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v. Davis et al
as 7:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rueda
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, Harold W. Clarke, Bledso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maurice Scott v. Melvin Davis
as 22-6122
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE PRESTON SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
MELVIN DAVIS, Warden
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Scott
Defendant:
Mr. Reynolds, Melvin Davis and B. J. Ravizee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Lee
as 2:2021cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Andrew Sidney Phillips, Samuel Matthews and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
