Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ragab Khamis Mohammad Abdelmoneim v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 5:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Ragab Khamis Mohammad Abdelmoneim
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Jose L. Luyanda and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bashel v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bhuwan Bashel
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Martha Medina-Maltes
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Mendoza v. QCHC, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Crystal Mendoza
Defendant:
QCHC, Inc., Johnny Bates, Donald Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
