Cases 11 - 20 of 138
Wall v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00787
Petitioner:
Michael D Wall
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WRIGHT v. GROSS
as 2:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH WRIGHT
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrow v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Morrow
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Alexander v. Sheriff
as 3:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BONEBRAKE v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BONEBRAKE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HICKINGBOTTOM v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. HICKINGBOTTOM
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, HOLCOMB, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitener v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
Michael Devel Whitener and Michael D Whitener
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Wright et al
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Defendant:
Philip Skodinski, Jeremy Wright, James Muller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael D Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
