Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar
as 15-7573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD BRINEGAR, C. DAVIS, B. PAYTON and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY GREGG L. HERSHBERGER and SERGEANT CRUMPAC
Wayne Williams v. Frank Bishop
as 15-6833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE V. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP, OFFICER RANDALL, COII, SERGEANT MERLING and others
Defendant:
JANICE GILMORE
Guy Shannon, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety
as 15-6500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUY G. SHANNON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, WARDEN J. PHILIP MORGAN and others
:
Rote Jr Ret USMC v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv03918
Plaintiff:
Howard Rote Jr Ret USMC
Defendant:
Richard J. Graham, Jr., Michael P. Thomas, Daniel Northcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Condon
as 1:2014cv08554
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Thomas
Defendant:
Richard J. Condon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2014cv08019
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Thomas
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education , J. David Jimenez, Daniel Albetta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Henson, Jr. v. Graham et al
as 1:2014cv02058
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard J. Graham, Jr., Denise Gelsinger, Michael P. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Brinegar et al
as 1:2014cv01291
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooper
Defendant:
Brad Brinegar, frank C or F Davis, B. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Brinegar et al
as 1:2013cv03873
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooper
Defendant:
Brad Brinegar, F. or C. Davis, Loggson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun-El v. Bishop et al
as 1:2013cv03868
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-El
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Michael P. Thomas, Lietutenant Liken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
