Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Willis v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Mike Schmidt and Multnomah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Roads et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Kelly Roads, Multnomah County, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Multnomah County District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Multnomah County District Attorney's Office, Mike Schmidt and Multnomah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2021cv01882
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Mike Schmidt, Oregon Att. Gen. Offc., Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2021cv01834
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Mike Schmidt, City of Portland, Multnomah County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Schmidt et al
as 7:2021cv00567
Petitioner:
Gary Waller
Respondent:
Major Mike Schmidt and Winston W. Clark, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gideonse v. Brown et al
as 3:2021cv01568
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gideonse
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Ellen Rosenblum, Patrick Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
Tony Rapheal McDonald
Defendant:
Mike Schmidt and Multnomah County Central DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Bernard v. T. J. Watson
as 20-3379
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON BERNARD
Amicus Curiae:
CHESA BOUDIN, JODY OWENS, MICHAEL DOUGHERTY and others
Gibson et al v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2020cv01580
Plaintiff:
Russell Schultz and Joseph Gibson
Defendant:
Mike Schmidt, Multnomah County District Attorney's Office and Brad Kalbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
