Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 583
Peters v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Defendant: Brian English, Moore, Gapski and others
Plaintiff: Andrew W Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2023cv02323
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ORR
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, JANE DOE, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff: JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant: TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff: BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00548
Plaintiff: RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, WHITNEY MOORE, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. REGALE et al
as 1:2023cv02170
Plaintiff: DERRIOUS MOORE
Defendant: DENNIS REGALE, FOX, CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02286
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01890
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOORE v. ISR FACILITY
as 1:2023cv01918
Plaintiff: REONTE MOORE
Defendant: ISR FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ASH
as 1:2023cv02019
Plaintiff: REONTE MOORE
Defendant: K. ASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?