Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murray v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Petitioner:
George Murray
Respondent:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Sgt. Hennin et al
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Calvin, III Murray
Defendant:
Sgt. Hennin, Lt. W. Bunn, Lt. Dabiri and others
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brown
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Parry Murray, Nancy K. Kopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disability Rights Maryland v. Prince George's County Public Schools et al
as 8:2021cv03001
Defendant:
Disability Rights Maryland, Prince George's County Public Schools, Dr. Monica Goldson, CEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Palma et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01090
Plaintiff:
Lilian Palma, Hernan Palma, D. Palma and others
Defendant:
Chief Marcus Jones, Officer Sean Petty, Deputy John-Luke Espinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Michele C Murray and Michele Murray
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00412
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
