Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Frederick Banks v. Kristin Valsuka, et al
as 17-1696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTIN VALSUKA, CYNTHIA MCSWIGGIN, ORLANDO L. HARPER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VICE PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frederick Banks v. Mark Wietzman, et al
as 17-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, Esq., DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, United States Department of Justice and others
Banks v. Trump et al
as 1:2016cv03253
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Mark Hornak, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016mc00061
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE, DAVID HICTON, ROBERT CESSAR and others
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BANKS v. BABBCOCK et al
as 2:2015cv01584
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
BRIAN BABBCOCK, MARK HORNAK, ADRIAN N. ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. VALSUKA et al
as 2:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
KRISTIN VALSUKA, CYNTHIA MCSWIGGIN, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
