Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carpino v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
as 8:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Carpino
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In the Matter of the Complaint of Derek Glen and Garrett Vanderheides
as 8:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
Derek Glen and Garrett Vanderheides
Defendant:
N/A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Wallace v. National Life Insurance Comp et al
as 8:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jerome N. Wallace, Sr.
Defendant:
National Life Insurance Comp and Prudential Life Insurance Comp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wallace v. United States Army et al
as 8:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Jerome H. Wallace, Sr. and Jerome N. Wallace, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Army and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Carter
as 8:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
James Earl Rico Jones
Respondent:
Sonya N. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
