Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Smith v. NetSpend Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and Netspend Legal Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Exzac, Inc. d/b/a Matrix International Financial Services v. Netspend Corporation
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Exzac, Inc. d/b/a Matrix International Financial Services and Exzac, Inc. doing business as Matrix International Financial Services
Defendant:
Ouro Global, Inc., f/k/a Netspend Corporation and Netspend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Ouro Global, Inc. v. Exzac Inc.
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ouro Global, Inc. and Netspend Corporation
Defendant:
Exzac Inc. doing business as Matrix International Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Brown v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation and Republic Bank and Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tavia Williams v. Netspend Corporation
as 8:2023cv01842
Plaintiff:
Tavia Williams
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gilbert Amis v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv06598
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Amis
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation, MetaBank, N.A. and Pathward, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
