Cases 11 - 17 of 17
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Sposaro v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv00953
Plaintiff:
Frank Sposaro
Defendant:
New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00939
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zahler v. United States et al
as 2:2012cv03075
Plaintiff:
Eric Zahler
Defendant:
United States, United States Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv05281
Plaintiff:
James Bryan , Jeffrey Ijams , William King and others
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Gaston v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 2:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kanal V Gaston
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Trend Micro Incorporated, Symantec Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hannah v. New Jersey State Police et al
as 3:2011cv05513
Plaintiff:
Peter Paul Hannah
Defendant:
New Jersey State Police, New Jersey Sheriff, Washington State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
