Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bales v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
David H. Bales
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Jean Darbouze, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. White et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Doniel Peoples
Defendant:
Mickey White, Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Wilson et al (INTAKE 2)
as 2:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Angela Wilson, Cathy Brown, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
Travis Hutchins
Defendant:
Walter Myers , Patrice Richie , Capt. Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slater v. Boben et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Demon Victorell Slater
Defendant:
Ms. Boben, Karla Jones, Sherry Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brundidge v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
James L. Brundidge
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Nathaniel Lawson, Joseph Dansby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Youngblood
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Carter F. Davenport, Derrick Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanding v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Eric Blanding
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Mr. Carter, Karla Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truss v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Quentin Truss
Defendant:
Dominic Jones, Larry Peavy, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
