Cases 11 - 20 of 1,390
Negron v. Ascension Health
as 1:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
Katherine Negron
Defendant:
Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sarkar v. City of New York
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
JAY SARKAR
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION FOR THE NEW YORK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Negron v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 4:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Lynnette Negron
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Negron v. Marion Eye Center et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Angel Negron
Defendant:
Marion Eye Center, DeeDee Brookhart and Lori Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Diaz-Colon
as 24-1409
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
SIXTO JORGE DIAZ-COLON
Interested Party:
OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON
Hammond et al v. Fieldly et al
as 2:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hammond and Dana Hepworth
Defendant:
John Fieldly, Nicholas Castaldo, Caroline Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Lugo-Montalvo
as 24-1344
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALAN LUGO-MONTALVO, a/k/a Allan Lugo-Montalvo
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON and KEHYLIS YOLANDA VAZQUEZ-TORRES
Negron v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06205
Plaintiff:
Emijacsiul Torres Negron
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Maisonet (Negron Sr.)
as 24-572
Defendant:
GUILLERMO NEGRON, SR., FRANCISCO MAISONET, JOSE MAISONET and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mason v. Sosa et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mason
Defendant:
Cecilio Magana Sosa and Maria Negron Tzintzon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
