Cases 11 - 20 of 107
MICKLES v. PARKER et al
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
NGHIA PARKER, PATRICE POWELL, BRITTANY HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PEARSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06858
Plaintiff:
CHERISSE M. PEARSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dordon v. Kosciusko County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Virgil Roy Dordon
Defendant:
Kosciusko County Jail, Quality Correctional Care, Matt Fransis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD et al v. ROZIJIA et al
as 2:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
ROZIJIA, CHAPLIN ROGERS, OFFICER RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON et al v. CAMBELL et al
as 1:2021cv01454
Defendant:
CAMBELL and HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
JIMMY YAGER and PATRICK PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Cambell et al
as 2:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Hancock County Jail and Major Cambell
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Yager and Patrick Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMIESON v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
LARRY JAMIESON
Defendant:
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC. and SECURIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROYSTER et al v. MINNETTE
as 3:2020cv00214
Plaintiff:
David L Royster, Danny W. Pearson and DAVID L. ROYSTER
Defendant:
Charles A. Minnette
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
