Cases 11 - 20 of 114
Bartley v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Bartley
Defendant:
Adam Collins, Lieutenant Horn, Sergeant Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v City of Norfolk, Police Officer Derek Proctor
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Eric Perkins
Defendant:
Derek Proctor, City of Norfolk, Police Officer Derek Proctor and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
James Phillips
Defendant:
E. J. Perkins, Susie Brock and Robert Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Fix et al
as 7:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gerrell Perkins
Defendant:
Deputy Fix, Deputy Wade, Inv. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
David Glenn Perkins
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinard v. Vandermark et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Ms. Vandermark, Brian Perkins, Melvin Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bria L. Young
Defendant:
Walker, K. Perkins, L. Currin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
Patricia S Perkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Penkins v. Windsor et al
as 3:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Claude A Perkins and Claude A. Penkins
Defendant:
Windsor, Mr. Haynes and Jim O. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
