Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Ford v. Bender, et al
as 12-1622
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALBERT FORD
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER ST. AMAND, in his official capacity as Superintendent of MCI-Cedar Junction and JAMES BENDER, in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Corrections
Defendant:
WILLIAM KEATING, MICHAEL BELLOTI, in his official capacity as Norfolk County Sheriff, KENNETH NELSON, in his official capacity as Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Correction and others
Diaz v. St. Amand
as 12-1413
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER ST. AMAND
Clark v. Clarke et al
as 1:2011cv11490
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Clark
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Luis S. Spencer, Peter St. Amand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuinness v. Massachusetts Department of Co, et al
as 11-1842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDAN MCGUINNESS
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, JAMES R. BENDER, Deputy Commissioner and others
Walters v. Pepe
as 11-1601
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN WALTERS
Respondent:
PETER ST. AMAND
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER A. PEPE, JR.
Nesbitt v. St. Amand
as 11-1497
Petitioner - Appellant:
RALPH NESBITT
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER ST. AMAND
Roberts et al v. St. Amand et al
as 1:2011cv10760
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts and Patrick Nerette
Defendant:
Peter St. Amand and Thomas N Neville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. St. Amand et al
as 1:2011cv10771
Plaintiff:
Derrick Washington
Defendant:
Peter St. Amand, John J. Jones, Glenn A. Doher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Duval et al
as 1:2011cv10048
Plaintiff:
Alvin Campbell
Defendant:
Ronald T. Duval, Jeffrey Grimes, Peter St. Amand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duclerc v. Bender et al
as 1:2010cv12050
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Duclerc
Defendant:
James Bender, Peter St. Amand and Peter A. Pepe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
