Cases 11 - 20 of 21
SLOAN v. POLAR et al
as 1:2017cv01614
Defendant:
NYGREM and MURAT POLAR
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00221
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MURAT POLAR
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER HULL TURNER LLP v. WALLER et al
as 1:2016cv02871
Plaintiff:
HOOVER HULL TURNER LLP
Defendant:
POLAR ENERGY (JERSEY) LIMITED, W2 LIMITED, DAVID WALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HARDEN v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv00237
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURK, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, JOSEPH LOLITH and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON R. HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MAIN v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv00049
Defendant:
JENNEFER BARNS, FARRAH BUNCH, R.N., MICHAEL BURK and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLANNERY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2016cv00214
Defendant:
DESMA ALLEN, CORIZON HEALTH, MEGAN MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH FLANNERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHONDA GADBERRY v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01396
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BARNES, DAVID BROWN, KELLEY L. CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA GADBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBSON v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01026
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and POLAR
Plaintiff:
GARY A. GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHANNON v. TRIVETT et al
as 1:2015cv00807
Defendant:
DANIEL ALTMAN, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, TONI JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. POLAR
as 1:2015mc00031
Defendant:
MURAT POLAR
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
