Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Cook v. Sasol North America Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01079
Plaintiff: Thomas F Cook
Defendant: Sasol North America Inc., Merisol USA LLC, Merisol Retirement Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
POTTER v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv07658
Petitioner: Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust, Paul Alvater, California Public Employees Retirement System and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: MULTI-STRATEGY MASTER FUND LIMITED, BLACKROCK CREDIT ALPHA MASTER FUND, L.P., LORD ABBETT BOND-DEBENTURE FUND, INC. and others
Defendant: THEO MELAS-KYRIAZI, PHILIDOR NETWORK ENTITIES, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff: TIMBER HILL LLC, LAURA POTTER and CITY OF TUCSON TOGETHER WITH AND ON BEHALF OF THE TUCSON SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Special Master: HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Not Classified By Court: Cathy Lochridge
Amicus Curiae: Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Lead Plaintiff: TIAA-CREF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Aduah Roberts v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv06912
Defendant: Administrative Committee for Group Annuity Contract GA-300 Issued by the Prudential Insurance Company of America, DOES, Defined Benefit Participant Relations for the Prudential Insurance Company of America and others
Plaintiff: Aduah Roberts
NOT USED
as 2:2015cv01101
Defendant: Cigna Life Insurance Company of North America, Lourdes R Elmore and Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00430
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Blackrock Allocation Target Shares: Series S Portfolio et al v. U.S. Bank National Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv09401
Plaintiff: Blackrock Allocation Target Shares: Series S Portfolio, Blackrock Balanced Capital Portfolio (FI), BLACKROCK CORE ACTIVE BOND FUND B and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M et al v. Citibank N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv09373
Plaintiff: FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M , LVS II LLC , PCM Fund, Inc. and others
Defendant: Citibank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Wu et al v. Prudential Financial, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv05392
Plaintiff: Michael H. Wu and Christine T. Wu
Defendant: Prudential Financial, Inc., Prudential Insurance Company Of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02953
Plaintiff: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY and others
Defendant: UBS REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC. , UBS SECURITIES LLC and MORTGAGE ASSET SECURITIZATION TRANSACTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Prudential Retirement Insuranc v. Harold Baker
as 13-1177
Petitioner: PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
Respondent: HAROLD A. BAKER
Party-in-Interest: KIM NOLTE, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of CIGNA 401(k) Plan, SHERRY LEWIS, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the CIGNA 401(k) Plan, THERESA MITCHELL, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the CIGNA 401(k) Plan and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?