Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Harrison et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Jon Buck, Benjamin Painter, Don Coleman and others
Defendant:
GoSmith, Porch.com, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Pamela Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CLARK v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05478
Plaintiff:
PAMELA CLARK
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
as 1:2018cv03527
Defendant:
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC. , JOHN DOE, MARY DOE and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLARK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12621
Plaintiff:
PAMELA CLARK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carson v. Stubblefield et al
as 4:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Kurt Carson
Defendant:
Gene Stubblefield, Leonard Edwards, Matthew Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plain v. Stubblefield et al
as 4:2016cv00540
Plaintiff:
Bobby Plain
Defendant:
Gene Stubblefield, Leonard Edwards, Matthew Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07035
Plaintiff:
Pamela Clark
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 1:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Pamela Clarke
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
