Cases 11 - 20 of 4,652
COHEN V. COMM OF PA
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
PAUL COHEN
Defendant:
COMM OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisenby v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS et al
as 5:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Paul Lisenby
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS, OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. and GYRUS ACMI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RYAN PAUL v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
RYAN PAUL
Defendant:
TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MICHAELSEN v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAELSEN
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
SEWELL v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
PAUL SAMUEL SEWELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JOHN DOE, TOM HESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. COHEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA JANE DOE, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
