Cases 11 - 20 of 214
Brosnan v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02337
Plaintiff:
Devin Brosnan
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Donald Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolfe v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02339
Plaintiff:
Garrett Rolfe
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Howard
as 1:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Obie Phillips
Defendant:
Paul Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Charles E Ferguson
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Bruce Landgraff, Gary Byias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Eric Alexander Stone
Defendant:
David Quinn, Christopher Brasher, Ural D. Glainville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Carr et al
as 4:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eric Alexander Stone
Defendant:
David Quinn, Christopher Brasher, Ural D. Glainville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCONNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59620
Plaintiff:
PAUL HOWARD MCCONNELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner et al v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2021cv02798
Plaintiff:
Mark Gardner, Lonnie Hood and Ivory Streeter
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard and Erika Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kidron Flavor v. Harold Melton, et al
as 21-11259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIDRON ISRAEL FLAVOR
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRELL DARK, THEODORE JACKSON, HAROLD D. MELTON, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Georgia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
