Cases 11 - 20 of 492
Hueston v. Gilay et al
as 5:2023cv01193
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc, Yonas Kifle Gilay, David Transportation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Ennis Hueston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Herriman v. The PepsiCo INC. Disability Plan et al
as 7:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Leea Herriman
Defendant:
The PepsiCo INC. Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Mccausland et al v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 5:2023cv04526
Plaintiff:
IAN MCCAUSLAND, Carlo Garcia and Michael Zurl
Defendant:
PEPSICO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mohamed v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Rayan Nafa Mohamed
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc doing business as New Bern Transportation Corp and New Bern Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Riseandshine Corporation v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 23-1176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Riseandshine Corporation, DBA Rise Brewing
Defendant / Appellee:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Bell v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 7:2023cv08600
Plaintiff:
Henry Bell
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
David Gumner v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Gumner
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Hoskin v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 7:2023cv06413
Plaintiff:
William Hoskin
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
