Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havens v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00870
Defendant:
N.P. R. King, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Roger Wayne Havens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Reliance First Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Foster and Marcus Foster
Defendant:
Ginnie Mae, US Bank, NA, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Uknown Gills, Connie Pierce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Bobby Pierce
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierce v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00149
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Pierce
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopson et al v. The Mississippi Bar et al
as 3:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Bobby W. Hopson and Mary F. Hopson
Defendant:
The Mississippi Bar, McGlinchey Stafford, Shapiro and Massey, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Pierce v. Morris et al
as 4:2017cv00155
Petitioner:
Ricky Shannon Pierce
Respondent:
Timothy Morris and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonson v. Dukes et al
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Sullivan Dukes, Jr., Amerihomes, LLC, Pierce Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.