Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Bowman et al v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ariel Bowman, Carey Reese and Daryl Culbertson
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Brayden L Leopold, Colin B Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rahming v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv03711
Plaintiff:
Kim Pierre Rahming
Defendant:
Robert Warren Jones and Stevens Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flattery v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2020cv02600
Plaintiff:
Sean Pierre Flattery
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Samuel v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spradley et al v. Burke
as 3:2019cv00407
Plaintiff:
Paula M Spradley and Joey C Spradley, Sr
Defendant:
Pierre Van Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mccloskey et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03419
Plaintiff:
Jim Skinner, Stacie Beam, Kenneth Coleman and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Diamond et al
as 1:2016cv03323
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Pierre Johnson
Defendant:
Diamond, Michael Higgins and Lt. Lippette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. Bragg
as 6:2015cv02109
Petitioner:
Dimitrious Pierre David
Respondent:
Travis Bragg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. Walden Correctional Institution et al
as 9:2015cv01345
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Pierre Young
Defendant:
Warden Dunlap, Major Roberts and C Watlington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gasque v. Georgetown County Detention Center
as 4:2014cv02250
Plaintiff:
Pierre C Gasque
Defendant:
Georgetown County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
