Cases 11 - 20 of 100
PITTMAN v. SMITH
as 3:2021cv00083
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SOWELL v. ALTOONA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00060
Defendant:
BADGE NUMBER # 264, BADGE NUMBER # 284, GEORGE SWANDER, III and others
Plaintiff:
MARKALE-ALSAMOD SOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PHINISEE v. GRAHAM-PARKER et al
as 2:2020cv05279
Plaintiff:
RASHEENA PHINISEE
Defendant:
AVANI SHAH, HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING NETWORK-THE HEALTH ANNEX and others
Petitioner:
KAI PITTMAN, SUSAN ENGLES, LAURA OPPENHEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
PITTMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2020cv00138
Defendant:
P. NUNEZ, REBECCA RIEFER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNEY et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv01211
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MCKENNEY-PITTMAN and RUDOLPH MCKENNEY
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
PITTMAN v. WETZEL
as 5:2019cv04945
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA DOC, WETZEL
Petitioner:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Blocker et al
as 4:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Tyree C Blocker , O.E. Rowles , Maurice A. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. United States Of America
as 3:2018cv00344
Plaintiff:
Doriel Pittman
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
