Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 711
Reshma Kamath v. Judith Ashmann Gerst et al
as 8:2023cv02193
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF'S COU RESHMA KAMATH and Reshma Kamath
Defendant: Elwood Lui, Marie Stratton, Judith Ashmann-Gerst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reshma Kamath v. The Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv08979
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF'S COU RESHMA KAMATH and Reshma Kamath
Defendant: The Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, WILLIAM D. STEWART, MICHAEL SCHULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mary Kamaka v. OSI Flemings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10269
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Mary Kamaka and Mary Kamaka
Defendant: Defendant OSI/FLEMINGS, LLC, OSI Flemings LLC doing business as Flemings Prime Steakhouse and Wine Bar Erroneously Sued As Bloomin Brands, Inc., Doe 1 Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018ml02814
Defendant: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation and Liaison Counsel for Defendants
Plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Matthew Finamore, Florinda Esparza and others
Special Master: Hon. Gary Allen Feess
Petitioner: Mark Fields, Bennie Fowler, Alan Draper and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Raj Nair and Robert Fascetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Hey Favor, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Hey Favor, Inc., FullStory, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Google LLC
Not Classified By Court: GoodRx Holdings, Inc. and Healthcare Plaintiffs in 22-cv-3580
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Holley et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv06972
Plaintiff: All Plaintiffs, Noel Flores, Carlos Proctor and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc., James W. Terry, Cynthia N. Jones and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Terrerce Smith, Aamira Mosely, Aaron C. Richardson, Sr. and others
Respondent: Hilliard Martinez Gonzales LLP and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Consolidated Defendant: Wanda A Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv04775
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
KAMATH v. MEDIONI et al
as 2:2023cv08938
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF'S COU RESHMA KAMATH
Defendant: DANIEL MEDIONI, SAMANTHA LAMM, TOMAS ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Allure Shurney v. Commissioner William D. Dodson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv08247
Plaintiff: Allure Shurney
Defendant: Commissioner William D. Dodson, Judge William D. Dodson, Judge Robin Miller Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?