Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Rowe v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2020cv00952
Defendant:
Arach Post Officers, ABIA, Sally Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lee Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennard v. Terelle State Post Office
as 3:2020cv00717
Petitioner:
Romona Kennard
Defendant:
Terelle State Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v. Williams et al
as 5:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lois Williams and United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Velasquez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv04637
Plaintiff:
Angie Velasquez
Defendant:
United States Post Office and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Hankerd v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 6:2019cv00523
Plaintiff:
Kendra Hankerd
Defendant:
United States Post Office, Homeland Security, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. United States Post Office
as 7:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Juan Fernando Chavez
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Brooks v. Wehner Multifamily, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00102
Defendant:
Wehner Multifamily, LLC and United States Post Office
Plaintiff:
Pam Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rasheed v. Ratcliffe et al
as 5:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Basil A Rasheed
Defendant:
John Ratcliffe, US Post Office, Veteran Affairs Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Clemons et al
as 4:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Richard N Tawe
Defendant:
Clemons, Unknown Mailroom Clerk, Unknown Beeville Post Office Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynoso v. Rudy Betancourt Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
Oneydi Reynoso
Defendant:
Rudy Betancourt Services, Inc., Post Office Street, Inc. and Rudy Betancourt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
