Cases 11 - 20 of 81
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. FONTES et al
as 2:2017cv08587
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
AUGUSTO FONTES, JOSE SIMOES, PAUL FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. Keville et al
as 1:2017cv11848
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
David Keville and Country Saloon Products, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Premium Sports Inc. v. Corbett et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Defendant:
Kathleen Corbett and Kathleen's Cottage LLC
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Premium Sports Inc. v. Burke et al
as 7:2017cv06265
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
John Burke and Green Isle Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Premium Sports Inc. v. Nichols et al
as 3:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Reeder G. Nichols and JJAGQ Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. SOUSA et al
as 2:2017cv03813
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
JOSE SOUSA, JOAO ABREU, ANA PAULA FREITAS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Premium Sports Inc. v. Valente et al
as 1:2017cv02333
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Rio Douro Italian Bistro Inc. and Carlos Valente
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Premium Sports Inc. v. Valente et al
as 2:2017cv02333
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Rio Douro Italian Bistro Inc. and Carlos Valente
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Premium Sports Inc. v. Mendes et al
as 1:2017cv01309
Defendant:
D & M Restaurant Corp. and Adelino Mendes
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Premium Sports Inc. v. Duarte et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Nuno Duarte and Columbus Grill Restaurant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
